— The Ontological Framework of Non-Nothingness, Causality, and the Genesis of God
Русский

CAUSALITY

In logic, a conclusion is a statement or proposition that follows logically from given premises. It is the final result of a deductive or inductive reasoning process. The premises provide evidence or support for the conclusion, and the conclusion can only be justified by the strength and validity of the premises.

Causality refers to the relationship between an event (the cause) and a second event (the effect), where the second event is a result of the first. In other words, causality is the principle that something (the cause) brings about, or leads to, something else (the effect). It is a fundamental concept in philosophy, science, and everyday experience.

The utmost fundamental phenomenon that lies in the foundation of causality is the necessary existence of non-nothingness. As we have discussed earlier, the necessary existence of non-nothingness provides the fundamental basis for causality and the principles of logic. Without the existence of non-nothingness, there would be no fundamental basis for the causal relationship between events.

Causality is a deeply ingrained aspect of our understanding of the world, and many philosophers and scientists have attempted to identify the ultimate foundation of causality. While the necessary existence of non-nothingness is an important concept in metaphysics, it does not directly provide the foundation for causality. Instead, it offers a framework for the existence of entities and their relationships, including causal relationships.

The nature of causality and its ultimate foundation remain debated among philosophers, but there are some widely accepted principles that underlie our understanding of causality. One such principle is the notion of regularity or constant conjunction, which asserts that causal relationships are established by the repeated observation of events occurring in a specific order. For example, when we observe that a lit match consistently leads to a flame, we infer a causal relationship between these two events.

Another principle is the idea of counterfactual dependence, which suggests that causality can be understood through the analysis of what would have happened if the cause had not occurred. This principle explores the “if-then” relationships between events, considering how the absence of a cause would lead to different outcomes.

The ultimate foundation of causality is an open question, and different philosophical perspectives offer different answers. Some perspectives posit that causality is an intrinsic feature of the world, while others argue that it is a human cognitive construct used to make sense of our experiences. Regardless of its foundation, causality remains a crucial concept for our understanding of the world and the relationships between events and entities.

What causes causality? (paradox)

How exactly the necessary existence of non-nothingness causes the phenomenon of causality between events? What are the events if we consider them from the viewpoint of the basic ontology of necessary existence of non-nothingness.

How can we define the concepts of what event is, and why events could cause other events? In other words why in the basic existence there are different events and why they can cause other events in principle? How the basic necessary existence of non-nothingness causes the existence of differentiality, or distinctions between events.

An event can be understood as a specific occurrence or change in the state of affairs involving entities or objects at a particular time and place. Events involve the interaction or transformation of objects and their properties and can be causally connected to other events.

The existence of different events and their causal relationships can be understood as emerging from the basic ontology of the necessary existence of non-nothingness. The fundamental existence of non-nothingness implies that there is a structure to reality that allows for distinct entities and their properties to exist. These entities, in turn, interact and transform, giving rise to events and causal relationships between them.

Differentiality, or distinctions between events, arises from the complex interplay of entities and their properties within the framework provided by the necessary existence of non-nothingness. As entities with different properties interact, they generate a rich tapestry of events that can be causally related to one another.

Causal connections emerge from the interactions between these distinct entities and their properties. The necessary existence of non-nothingness does not directly cause these causal connections but rather provides the foundation that allows for the existence of entities and their interactions.

In summary, the necessary existence of non-nothingness supports the existence of distinct entities and events within reality. These entities and their properties interact and transform, giving rise to a variety of events and causal relationships. Differentiality and causality arise from the complex interplay of entities within the ontological framework provided by the necessary existence of non-nothingness.

← Previous chapter · Table of Contents · Next chapter →