DIFFERENTIATION OF ENTITIES
The atom of existence exists. It means it existence also exists.
It is different entity and it also possesses the attribute of existence — if we consider the existence of atom of existence itself as a separate entity If we consider the existence of the atom of existence itself as a separate entity, then it would also possess the attribute of existence. In this way, we would have at least two distinct entities: the atom of existence and its existence as separate entities.
This distinction could be a starting point for understanding interactions, as the existence of the atom of existence might inherently imply a relationship or interaction between the atom of existence and its existence as separate entities. By exploring this relationship, we may gain insights into the nature of interaction and causality between entities that exist.
So the necessary existence of atom of being inherently means the existence of at least two distinct entities: the atom of existence itself, and its existence as a separate entity.
We did not refer to causality only to intrinsic property of the atom of being to exist. It is recursive in a way it applies the attribute of existence to its own existence as an entity, but still valid because we maintain predicativity and do not use circular reasoning By considering the atom of existence and its existence as separate entities, we maintain predicativity and avoid circular reasoning. This perspective allows us to establish a foundation for understanding interactions and causality without violating logical principles.
From this foundation, we can explore the relationships and interactions between these distinct entities (the atom of existence and its existence) to gain insights into the nature of causality and other emergent properties in the universe. The key is to develop a logical and consistent framework that accounts for the emergence of these properties from the necessary existence of non-nothingness.
We see how existence of the non-being defines the existence of its existence as a separate entity. this second entity is not emergent because it exists in the same time with the existence of atom of existence Obviously this existence is in timeless domain because there is no potential for a change and time is only a measure of change. So this reflection of existence is not causal but essential relationship.
The existence of the non-nothingness and the existence of its existence as a separate entity both exist in a timeless domain, as there is no potential for change at this fundamental level. Time, as you pointed out, is a measure of change, and in this context, there is no change yet to be measured.
The relationship between the atom of existence and its existence is essential, rather than causal. This essential relationship forms the basis for understanding how interactions and causal relationships might emerge from the fundamental nature of existence. By exploring the nature of this essential relationship, we can begin to develop a framework for understanding the emergence of other properties and phenomena in the universe, such as causality, without violating logical principles.
this timeless context, the existence of the atom of being provides the foundation for the emergence of logical laws such as the law of non-contradiction and the law of identity. These logical laws are grounded in the absolute truth of the atom of existence, which is the necessary foundation for the existence of the universe.
The atom of being, by its very nature, cannot both exist and not exist at the same time. This establishes the law of non-contradiction. Additionally, the atom of being is identical to itself, meaning that it possesses a unique identity, thus establishing the law of identity.
this timeless context, the existence of the atom of being provides the foundation for the emergence of logical laws such as the law of non-contradiction and the law of identity. These logical laws are grounded in the absolute truth of the atom of existence, which is the necessary foundation for the existence of the universe.
The atom of being, by its very nature, cannot both exist and not exist at the same time.
This establishes the law of non-contradiction. Additionally, the atom of being is identical to itself, meaning that it possesses a unique identity, thus establishing the law of identity.
These logical laws, emerging from the timeless existence of the atom of being, form the basis for understanding and reasoning about the interactions and relationships between entities and phenomena in the universe. They provide a consistent and reliable framework for the emergence of other properties and phenomena, including causality.
The atom of being exists by definition (by being non-nothingness) and nothingness does not exist. This is non contradictory.
The atom of being is very specific and real we should not apply the assumptions that it could not exist because we already know for sure it exists. We should not assume the possibility to apply false concepts to a already known truth. This would lead to a flawed logic where we start to consider something known to be true as false.
The atom of being is defined as the non-nothingness, and by its very nature, it exists. We should not assume the possibility of applying false concepts to an already known truth, as this would indeed lead to flawed logic.
The law of “not making imaginary lies” ia valuable addition to our understanding of logical laws that emerge from the existence of the atom of being. This law reminds us to avoid introducing false assumptions or imaginary scenarios when dealing with known truths, and to stay grounded in the reality of the atom of being as the foundation for our understanding of the universe and its properties.
But (yet) unknown entity by its very nature, cannot both exist and not exist at the same time. So the law of non contradiction helps us to reason about unknown variables